Posts circulating on X claim that the attack coincided with the hashrate dip and suggest it may have taken Iranian miners offline, removing “secret hashrate” from the network. Others are reviving perennial fears of a “hashrate crash,” pointing to the one-day average hashrate briefly dipping to 600 EH/s.
Many of these interpretations misunderstand how Bitcoin’s hashrate is actually estimated—an error that recurs as reliably as the network’s halving cycle.
Bitcoin’s hashrate is derived from mining difficulty and block production intervals, which means short-term figures can swing wildly due to randomness. The one-day hashrate metric is particularly volatile and often reflects statistical noise—essentially, how “lucky” miners get—rather than any fundamental shift in network capacity. By the same logic, it would be misleading to claim that Bitcoin’s hashrate has surpassed 1 zettahash based solely on a one-day spike.
For those interested in the technical details:
Hashrate (hashes per second) = Difficulty × 2³² / Average block interval (in seconds)
In this equation, the numerator remains constant throughout a given difficulty epoch, so fluctuations in estimated hashrate are entirely driven by variations in block production time.
Each market cycle brings a wave of newcomers who misread these fluctuations. The “hashrate crash” narrative resurfaces whenever metrics decline sharply, despite the probabilistic nature of block production in Bitcoin mining.
A more grounded explanation points to seasonal curtailment in North America as the likely cause. Pool-level data (see screenshot above) shows that the steepest drop came from Foundry USA Pool, which intermittently went offline before rebounding. This pattern is consistent with summer grid management in the U.S., where miners curtail operations during peak electricity demand to help stabilize the grid.
Even if some Iranian capacity was disrupted, the impact appears marginal compared to the widespread curtailments affecting major U.S.-based pools. It’s also unlikely that significant Iranian hashrate would be routed through Foundry USA, a U.S.-based pool subject to sanctions compliance.
Looking ahead, bitcoin’s next difficulty adjustment is expected around June 29 and could mark the steepest downward retarget since the aftermath of China’s 2021 mining ban—potentially steeper than the -7.32% drop seen during the 2022 bear market’s miner capitulation.
That said, the network hashrate appears to be recovering. The projected difficulty adjustment, which was estimated at nearly -10% a few days ago, is now expected to be slightly under -8%.
Regardless of the final figure, the anticipated difficulty drop should offer some temporary relief—especially for miners operating at the margin amid post-halving economics and summer curtailments.
Regulation News
- Norway plans temporary ban on power-intensive cryptocurrency mining – Reuters
Hardware and Infrastructure News
Corporate News
Financial News
Feature
- What Tariffs Will — and Won’t — Change for U.S. Bitcoin Miners – Coindesk
- Mining Bitcoin is about to get a whole lot easier — here’s what’s driving it – DL News
